Of course, not all the historians of Britain after the Historia put a wonder-list
in their works. This is particually true of the works that were chronologies, rather than
histories, i.e. those that were, essentially, a glorified list of dated events.
Of the more well-known works a (sometimes cursory) glance suggests the following
don't include wonder-lists - though it should be noted that such lists are
not high on the agenda of historian-transcribers:
- Marianus Scotus (Biography)
Chronicon* (1082 CE)
- Florence of Worcester (Biography)Chronicon ex chronicis* (1117 CE)
- Eadmer (Biography)
Historium Novorum* (1122 CE)
- William of Malmesbury (Biography) Gesta Regum Anglorum* (1127 CE)
- Symeon/Simeon of Durham (Biography)
Historia regum Anglorum et Dacorum* (1129 CE)
- Roger of Hoveden (Biography)
Chronica (1192 CE)
- William of Newburgh (Biography)
Historia rerum Anglicarum* (1198 CE)
- Walter Map (c.1137-1209 CE)(Biography)
De Nugis Curialium* ( CE)
- Matthew Paris (c.1200-1259 CE) (Biography)
Chronica majora*;
Historia minor*
- Richard of Cirencester (Biography) (c.1335-c.1401 CE)
Speculum Historiale de Gestis Regum Angliae, 447-1066*
- Liber Monasterii de Hyda* (c. late 14th C.)
- Adam of Usk (Biography)
Chronicle* (1404 CE)
- William Camden (Biography)
Britannia* (1586 CE)(though
he implies seeing a list)
Other works that may be worth checking include:
- Michael Drayton (Biography)
Poly-Olbion (1613 CE)